this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
9 points (80.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2198 readers
177 users here now

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BertramDitore 4 points 1 year ago

Ohh boy, part 1 was so bad. I got through the whole thing, but it sure wasn’t easy. And I'm a Sci-Fi nut. Show me spaceships and big planets in the sky and it's hard for me to dislike your movie. But man this movie sucked. I feel like Snyder asked “how can we make this movie as difficult to watch as possible?” And then he went and outdid himself. He really is a terrible filmmaker, and I didn't fully understand it until this movie. His movies look gorgeous as a slideshow, but don’t have a coherent narrative or storytelling goal, and the visuals are so damn distracting. They do nothing for the plot.

The slo-mo isn’t cute anymore. It’s incredibly distracting, and the more I see it the more I believe he slows everything way down because he doesn’t trust his actors or the writing to move the plot along. And I don’t know if anyone else noticed, but he’s now resorting to double slo-mos. He slows things way down, pauses, and then slows it down even more. Sorry, but that shit is nothing but a waste of everyone’s time. Seeing a blaster shoot in slo-mo is cool, once. Once. Not every goddamn time.

Leaving aside how hilariously derivative the whole story is, I wish Snyder would at least trust his actors enough to act in a movie, not in a series of slow-moving photographs.