this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
27 points (77.6% liked)
Pop Culture
203 readers
1 users here now
News and discussions about celebrities, whether they be actors, musicians, social media influences, politicians, or anyone else of reasonable renown, as well as other cultural issues.
Rules:
-
No hate speech, personal attacks, harassment, doxxing, bullying, etc. are all strictly forbidden.
-
Posts must directly relate to Pop Culture in some form. Memes are acceptable if they are not excessive. Moderators have discretion and will work with community members to determine when such content becomes excessive.
-
AI-generated articles, pictures, and videos are prohibited. This does not preclude posts about AI, so long as it is about pop culture.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Idk, it sure sounds to me like this person thinks this album cover is equivalent to child porn. If I'm wrong I'm sorry, I've just seen a lot of weird prudes think a naked baby is sexual and should never be seen by anyone ever
I think the meaning was 'entire books of kid nudes aren't restricted because existing laws, so there is no way such a cover would' and tbh we think we're all on the same page by thinking the case around this cover is complete bullshit
That's prob a good explanation, I should give them the benefit of the doubt and not just get aggressive over misinterpreted stuff :c again sorry kadu if that wasn't your intent, you're definitely right I agree, this seems like a ridiculous and not legally justified thing to stir up shit about every few years, but idk a lot of the context so maybe this person is a victim of some kind of abuse for all I know (other than stuff experienced by a lot of child stars, which they might've wound up being Idk)