Asklemmy

43806 readers

836 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

128

Why don't rabies infected humans act like rabies infected animals (lemmy.today)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This always puzzled me. Why don't humans act much more aggressive or crazed like its often depicted with animals. Afaik there's 2 types of rabies, "dumb" and "furious" so my question is more towards the 2nd type. For example, we never hear of rabies causing a human to accidentally bite another human so why is that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Mice have been known to spread plague even in recent times, for example. Fortunately, it's treatable with antibiotics.

[–] shalafi 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Uh, that's from their fleas, not bites. FFS, did no one else get through high school history? Or has education fallen this far off?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's kind of a "no duh" statement. Everybody knows fleas transmit it. The point is that it's still around.

[–] shalafi 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For American's, isn't it more of a SW desert thing? Hantavirus and such?

LOL, and a post below here is acting like, "Sorry, can't be bothered to remember." The various plagues were kinda important in history, don't think many teachers are skipping over that bit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I was actually thinking of Oregon. When I lived there a few years back, there were a couple of cases of people who came down with plague after handling wild mice (because of the fleas, obviously, but that should be able to go without saying).

Hantivirus, to my knowledge, can happen anywhere but is more prevalent in the American west, including southwest.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

You can get Hantavirus from their dried urine, saliva, and feces though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I thought it was the beams from the eyes of sick people that spread it?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory_(vision)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Oh no, we're all just more concerned about affording to survive, and can't be bothered to remember a detail about a disease from hundreds of years ago that is no longer a threat whatsoever.