this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
-14 points (18.2% liked)

Vegan

311 readers
1 users here now

An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.

Rules and miscellaneous:

  1. We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
  2. No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
  3. Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
  4. Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
  5. All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: It's become clear to me that so far the vegan community on Lemmy (unlike Reddit) is lacking and overrun by non-vegans. So please only answer this if you're actually vegan. I'm seeking a vegan perspective on this.

With that out of the way, is it speciesist to have a favourite animal? Many vegans consider themselves dog ๐Ÿ• lovers or cat ๐Ÿˆ lovers ("ailurophiles") first and foremost, aside from animal lovers (who actually respect animals hence their veganism) in general. Others, like Joey Carbstrong, say that pigs ๐Ÿ– are their favourite animal and always have been even since before they went vegan; maybe some saw the movie "Babe" and developed an affection for them, for example. It's understandable. And others like cows ๐Ÿ„ or chicks ๐Ÿฅ or lambs ๐Ÿ‘ of course.

But as much as it might be a natural thing to gravitate to a certain species of animal, and "favouritise" them, is that still a form of speciesism? Of course if you're not actually exploiting the animals that aren't your favourite then it's only a mental matter. But is it still wrong even just to view them differentially and prefer or hold more love for some species than others? Loving an individual than another makes sense. But would you love one race of people more than other? Do you say "Greek people are my favourite race" (as a non-Greek person, for sake of example)? If not, and if that would be considered racist, then why is it not speciesist to prefer one species over others, even if just mentally?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Grapetruth -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All of your talking points are very much what non-vegans and anti-vegans say. So please just be honest and tell me if you're vegan or not.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm a vegan, I don't see why any of my points would have me support eating meat or other animal products. Check my comment history if you don't believe me.

[โ€“] Grapetruth 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Okay I believe you (Not all vegans are the same after all. For example some people call themselves vegan when they're really just eating a plant-based diet, still buy other animal products, or don't have very strong views about animal rights. Not saying that's the case here but when there are fewer vegans in a community, there can be more of that.)

But what confused me is that rather than just answering the question of whether it's speciesist to prefer one animal species over another (even when respecting both of their rights by being vegan), you mostly went on a tangent about rejecting the comparison between racism and speciesism, even though vegans typically stress the fact that both forms of discrimination of individuals are comparable to each other, and it's usually people who are against the vegan movement who try to argue they aren't, and say things like "Considering humans and non-human animals as the same is problematic" (even though that's a strawman since the vegan position acknowledges the differences between species but advocates for moral treatment of all species regardless).

I just don't really understand. Do you for example think that it's wrong to compare immoral treatment of humans to immoral treatment of non-human animals? Because that's the vibe I'm getting.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I went on a "tangent" rather than answering your question, because I don't agree with the underlying assumption.

You asked if it was speciesist to prefer one species over another. By definition it is, thats just what speciesism is defined as. I have an issue with the underlying assumption that speciesism is

a) bad

and

b) the same as racism

I could've just said: "yes, that is indeed speciesist", but that wouldn't have gotten my point across.

Your last paragraph hosently doesn't have anything to do with anything I said. I don't care about morals, but I believe one shouldn't cause any more suffering than necessary, that goes for humans and animals.

[โ€“] Grapetruth -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're vegan, yet you don't think speciesism is bad, and you don't care about morals... right... ๐Ÿคจ

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Here's an idea: I am a vegan because it is my belief that suffering is bad. I don't need to believe in speciesism and I don't need to follow any moral code for that, it's just the result of very simple ethical reasoning.

And what's with this gatekeeping anyway? Am I not a vegan unless I say and believe exactly what other vegans do? Does deciding to be a vegan, rather than to blindly follow my societies moral code make me any less of a vegan than someone coming from a vegan culture?

[โ€“] Grapetruth 1 points 11 months ago

Recognising that speciesism is an immoral form of discrimination comparable to other forms like racism is key to animal liberation. So I believe rejecting the comparison is contrary to what veganism actually stands for.