Asklemmy

43974 readers

1997 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

107

What would you consider your political ideology to be? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

226 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm just curious for the new or existing people? Lemmy.ml has taken a hard turn to the right since the reddit exodus. There's been a lot of pro-imperialist propaganda being posted on world news, and a lot less diversity of opinion. It feels more neoliberal and neo-con to me.

Does anyone want to share what their political leanings are?

I'll start; I'm anti-imperialist pro-state regulated capitalism. I believe we should have usage based taxes (toll roads, carbon tax) and luxury taxes, and I disagree with wealth taxes for people with less than $250 million. The state should spend more money on consumer protection in all industries (environment, health, finance, etc.) I believe in multipolarity vs. US hegemony.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gadg3tm 1 points 1 year ago

Mutualist. All anarchists and socialist but not all socialists are anarchists. I'm not sure how a complete, to each according their need to each according their ability would work, so I prefer keeping money. As all communities and businesses would be decentralized and ran by direct democracy there is little to no concern of monopolies, corruption and greed. Businesses could still grow and branch out but because it has to win a popular vote in a city to get the land needed once all owner/operators have voted to expand, there isn't concern of businesses coming in that aren't wanted just because a land owner wanted the money. Obviously the strength and Achilles heel is people participating in direct democracy.