this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
weirdway
70 readers
1 users here now
weird (adj.)
c. 1400,
• "having power to control fate", from wierd (n.), from Old English wyrd "fate, chance, fortune; destiny; the Fates," literally "that which comes,"
• from Proto-Germanic wurthiz (cognates: Old Saxon wurd, Old High German wurt "fate," Old Norse urðr "fate, one of the three Norns"),
• from PIE wert- "to turn, to wind," (cognates: German werden, Old English weorðan "to become"),
• from root wer- (3) "to turn, bend" (see versus).
• For sense development from "turning" to "becoming," compare phrase turn into "become."
OVERVIEW
This is a community dedicated to discussing subjective idealism and its implications. For a more detailed explanation, please take a look at our vision statement.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
An omnipotent entity would either declare those 2 friends as "powerful enough" and by virtue of this declaration it would become true for all intents and purposes of that entity. Alternatively, this entity would never get lonely in the first place, because it would routinely encounter people like itself, at an appropriate power level, because that's the entity's will, and it being omnipotent, as it wills, so it is.
Basically an omnipotent entity has arbitrary tuning of anything and everything. There are no problems that remains problems for long.
For an omnipotent entity a problem is when they change how they want their experience to be, but didn't get around to actually changing their experience yet. And being able to contemplate possibilities without those contemplations spilling out into the protected domain of experience is part of omnipotence too.
Although I have to say it's weird to call an omnipotent being "an entity." It's like attributing will and life to a body, just as wrong in the final analysis. I would refer to something as an entity when I regard it as distinct from myself and as being "out there." When I regard myself I am not en entity to myself. Just like to myself I am also not a body or anything other concrete and optional.
Originally commented by u/mindseal on 2017-09-24 16:45:54 (dnfhzj7)
If I ever did come across such beings, I think I would help them along but ultimately leave it up to them to decide. I'm not in the business of subjugating other conscious beings, but I'm open to helping them and giving ideas to them. It would be their choice to come along or even participate in any of this.
Originally commented by u/Green-Moon on 2017-09-25 12:11:34 (dngugc6)
I think mostly the same way, except if someone or something crosses one of my red lines, I will take a decisive measure. I want to be kind but not squishy.
Originally commented by u/mindseal on 2017-09-25 12:24:39 (dngv276)