this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1385 points (96.4% liked)

solarpunk memes

2783 readers
954 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This binary thinking from activists really annoys me.

[–] sturlabragason 6 points 11 months ago

Binary thinking everywhere all the time. People love polarizing ideas. Makes things easy. Harder to think holistically.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You seriously need to ask? You do not want to actually understand how it may work, how much it may cost, how realistic it is? And instead you would use “energy companies = bad” and if they also want to participate in carbon capture, then it is ALL you need to know and reject the idea simply based on this. You do not see this as binary??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Companies = bad

Or a bit more nuanced: Under a capitalist system, the first order of business is to make money. That does not have to be bad a priori, but with the given scenario of carbon capture, the meme points out the fact, that it is mostly greenwashing. Does that mean carbon capture is bad? No. Is it the best way to tackle climate change? Absolutely not. Does it make them money and delay actual action to combat the climate crisis? Yes.

But that wouldn't be a meme, would it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Making a meme does not mean that you have to do it as a one-bit stupidity. That's not a valid excuse.

There is no single technology that will tackle climate change, it will/does require combined approach and carbon capture quite possible have a role there to play too. And as for companies making money, they do make monies on solar, wind, electrical cars, and they will make money on carbon capture, hopefully. If there is no money to be made, then it would be a very good indication that the idea is dead on arrival.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

System change, not climate change

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

yeah, no one's getting distracted