this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
162 points (99.4% liked)

Games

16457 readers
973 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If marketing promises something, you should live up to that, even if plans change. If you haven't gotten to the stage where you know what kind of game it is, you shouldn't be marketing it that way yet.

Sure, things can change but if it's something that might change, don't market it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's fine to be aspirational and fail, but transparency and communication are key when that happens, but it's also on the consumer to not trust years old marketing, games change all the time, some fundamentally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Old marketing for an old product, sure. Products change over time. However forward marketing for a product yet to be released should be accurate at release.