Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
No. Ebolas is less than Covid
https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-015-0043-3
I’m not the one who keeps making things up that I have to correct.
Yes, of course Ebola has a lower R0 than recent COVID; respiratory infections tend to have higher R0. It's easier to infect others when you can do it through shared air. As COVID variants became more infectious the R0 increased. But Ebola's R0 is 1.9 compared to Wuhan-1's 1.8.
But COVID's R0 was lower than other respiratory infections. My post isn't that complicated; there's really zero reason you should have this much trouble following it. My god, man.
I'm correcting you in nearly every post. Your "corrections" are all things you're imagining me saying.