this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)

Open Source

31359 readers
206 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After 1 year, 9 months, and 28 days of development, the Debian project is proud to present its new stable version 12 (code name "bookworm").

"bookworm" will be supported for the next 5 years thanks to the combined work of the Debian Security team and the Debian Long Term Support team.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I, for one, am pleased to see that you can optionally turn on nonfree firmware should you need it. The FSF my bloviate, but this was truly needed for those computing at home

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is very sad that this has become necessary, though. GPU and Wi-Fi vendors have delivered a serious setback on the path to computing freedom.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think we would all vastly prefer that our computers worked just fine with 100% free code.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess we need open hardware for open drivers to be the norm.

This quite stupidly has some geopolitical implications as well, if "anyone" can manufacture decent GPUs, there goes the Western chip-making monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think so. Open source hardware only specifies what the hardware can do in terms of instructions, not in which quality in terms of speed or energy efficiency.

Producing high-quality hardware would still mean that you need the means of production and that will still be the same few people as now.

It would mean tho that the firmware and drivers will be open source.