this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
12 points (92.9% liked)

theism

53 readers
1 users here now

About us

An open, user owned community for the general discussion of the interpretation of earthly phenomena and scientific findings, which focuses on the existence of the divine. Here you can exchange personal views and meanings around this topic.

Rules

1. Be polite to others and respects each others opinions.This community is explicitly not here to disapprove of other views. For the most helpful critique, please consult this web article. Remember: Your freedom ends where somebody else's begins. Remember that there are people that may see things differently than you.

2. Keep it theme-oriented, up to date and relevant.In general, all types of contributions are allowed, but the relevance to this community must always be evident and presented openly by the contributor. Posts that do not meet these requirements will be removed after a public warning.

3. No misinformation or anti-scientific rhetoricEven though this is primarily a philosophical community, we attach great importance to a scientific basis in the discussion. No dissemination of scientifically disproved information will be tolerated. Users found to be sharing such rhetoric will be immediately and permanently banned.

Users who spread misinformation — which differs from disinformation, which is done with intent — will have their submissions/comments removed and receive a warning.

4. Make sure that information is conveyed in an elaborate way.In order to ensure an open and constructive discourse, it is necessary to deal with information in a transparent way. Therefore whenever possible, please link to scientific sources for claims that you make and make sure that the title is descriptive and understandable.

5. Use self-moderation measures first before reporting.This community is fundamentally built upon freedom of speech. Since everyone understands minimalism differently and we do not want to exclude any kind of content a priori, we appeal to the individual users to block/mute posts or users who do not meet their requirements. Please bear this in mind when filing a report.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At the beginning of this young community, I thought it might be helpful to make a clear distinction between the definitions as they differ greatly in their explainability. Contrary to some opinions that can be heared, the statements a) there are one/more divine beings and b) no divine beings exist are logically equivalent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PropaGandalf 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Nice take. The question really is: Where does it all end? And what does this say about "intelligence"? What is the fundamental concept of intelligence applying at the smallest scale of our universe? Could it be the drive to create information structures and order against entropy?

[–] Buffalox 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes we don't know where it ends. But we do know that Atoms, electrons, neutron and protons, all have some pretty sophisticated behaviors. This continues into the quantum realm, where it seems even more complex. But I'm not well enough versed in quantum mechanics, to actually understand it at that level. And we can't say for sure that quantum level is the final smallest level, it's just the smallest we can detect.

[–] PropaGandalf 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Exactly. I can imagine that there is a fundamental mechanism that works in contrary to the second law of thermodynamics using the expanding space of the universe to create information structures.

[–] Buffalox 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, I've believed that for some time, it seems there is still matter popping into the universe. There are also virtual particles that interact with real particles. Although these are theoretical, it shows the need in quantum theory to explain how information is passed between particles. But I'm getting a bit into deep water now.

BTW, the meaning of the second law of thermodynamics, is often wildly exaggerated. It's not actually a law, but a probability. Also the "law" is in regard to a closed system, and I'm not sure it has been proven that the universe is actually a completely closed system.