Statecraft

178 readers

1 users here now

URL has to point to the actual article
Body has to have an archive link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

3M, DuPont defeat massive class action over forever chemicals (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link

"Seldom is so ambitious a case filed on so slight a basis," wrote Circuit Judge Raymond Kethledge, noting there are thousands of companies that have manufactured PFAS but just 10 listed as defendants in the case.

How on earth did that happen? It's such a disappointment, but at the same time I understand the judicial system has to follow the law and apply it equally.

Why was the lawsuit so limited in the first place?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CharlesMangione 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Controlled opposition. Force a weak claim on a legitimate issue through the court. When the court rejects it on procedural grounds, now there is precedent.

Source: my ass

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the precedent is only set when a case is won. At least that was my impression as a non-USer.

[–] CharlesMangione 3 points 1 year ago

I could be mistaken, and I look forward to being corrected by someone who knows for sure.