this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
76 points (98.7% liked)

Interesting Global News

2489 readers
460 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So because France considers their definition to be the same or better, they block it from becoming the definition for the whole bloc where other countries have looser definitions. Make no sense and makes them the bad guy here holding off the progress.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or they're saying "come back with a better one". That doesn't seem unreasonable or evil, especially if the ultimate outcome IS a better definition of rape.

Again, I'm no jurist and I haven't looked into the details of this, but I don't think weakening the law in some countries is a good outcome even if it strengthens it in others. The French government's stated concerns seem legitimate to me and I'd like to see those concerns addressed by the Commission before dismissing them as "bad guy behavior".

(And let's be clear here: I'm not French and I have no love for the French government, many members of which are or were accused rapists IIRC)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

After reading about the convention, it doesn't contradict the proposed definition, and the convention is using a definition limited in scope only defining violence against women or trans women. But not men, who can also be victims of rape. Also, the convention is voluntary, and any signatory country can leave it any time, like Turkey already did.

So again, there is no reason to oppose the definition as it's currently proposed, as it doesn't contradict the definition used by convention and expands it to cover areas that convention doesn't.