this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
87 points (98.9% liked)

retrocomputing

4022 readers
1 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The first computer I ever worked on had 8KB of core memory. It was an old Digital Equipment Corporation pdp-8/e. I loved that machine and its open face tale drives and teletype with paper tape punch and reader and card reader.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Is that... 32 bytes of memory? Wow, I didn't know they also came in rope form factor as well.

Some cores appear to touch other neighboring cores. Won't that cause issues to the core's magnetic properties?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The touching of the cores isn't really important, what matter is which specific wires run through each core vs around/outside each core. That weave pattern defines the addressing scheme and the data stored in each address.

http://madrona.ca/e/coremem/index.html Core memory

http://madrona.ca/e/corerope/index.html Rope memory

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

After digging some more, looks like core rope memory is different than the magnetic core memory in your link above (seems to describe magnetic core memory instead of rope memory). Core rope memory is used for ROM while magnetic core memory is used for RAM, and they have different working mechanism.

Another form of core memory called core rope memory provided read-only storage. In this case, the cores, which had more linear magnetic materials, were simply used as transformers; no information was actually stored magnetically within the individual cores. Each bit of the word had one core. Reading the contents of a given memory address generated a pulse of current in a wire corresponding to that address. Each address wire was threaded either through a core to signify a binary [1], or around the outside of that core, to signify a binary [0]. As expected, the cores were much larger physically than those of read-write core memory. This type of memory was exceptionally reliable. An example was the Apollo Guidance Computer used for the NASA Moon landings.

Basically, 1 if the sense wire going through the core, or 0 if the wire bypass the core. You basically woven 1 and 0 manually into the rope. And yeah, it doesn't matter if the cores touch each other as long as the wires are woven correctly. This article have some wiring diagram for the core rope memory: http://www.righto.com/2019/07/software-woven-into-wire-core-rope-and.html .

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, my bad, I linked the wrong page!, edited to include both

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All this stuff is really cool! Looks like you can use one ring to store multiple bits by using multiple sense wire. So that's why there are a lot of wires in the images. Seems like there are 16 bits for each core?

I wonder how feasible it is for someone to built their own retro computers by soldering a bunch of nand gates and weaving their own ram and rom. The only problem seems to be getting the ferrite cores in huge quantities (are those still being sold these days?).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I totally want to try, I think ferrite toroids are everywhere, but the material that core/rope memory rings are made of has a specific magnetic response hysteresis which is important.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There goes my dream building my own computer if I survived a nuclear apocalypse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, I see what you mean by

Is that… 32 bytes of memory?

No, each wire that goes through the rope, weaving through or around each of the ferrite rings, represents one or multiple bytes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Looks like there are 16 wires for each core in this module?