this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5808 readers
1207 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This means we can win this war. This doesn't mean get complacent. At minimum, keep pressure on the enemy so they don't have time to regroup, rebuild, and plan a counter attack.
We are making progress on the energy production line. Let's cut off the fossil fuel economic base. Let's go after car dependent design. Let's go on the attack at local elections and zoning and planning meetings. Gaining ground on the car dependency front cuts off vital resources the enemy needs to supply their troops.
It's a major election year in the US. If my fellow yanks blitzkrieg the polls, we can deal a crippling, maybe even fatal, blow. From our allies, keep active on the interwebs. Encourage yanks to get out to vote. Call out BS!
So a Trump White House would be better?
Think about this for a second. People always blame the president for gas prices, even though they don't have as much influence as people believe. Him keeping priced reasonable keeps him elected. The world is dependent on fossil fuels right now. If we were to stop producing tomorrow, store shelves would be empty. There would be global famine. It would not be pretty. I.e. his options are bad and worse.
Local governments are where some of the most important fights are. The more municipalities reduce car dependency, the more these oil projects will be a moot point and waste of BP/Exxon/etc money.
So what are you trying to accomplish? Convince people to give up? It is possible to turn things around. I'm sure things seemed pretty hopeless in some of the first Axis occupied countries in the beginning of WW2.