this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
31 points (89.7% liked)

Games

16762 readers
1414 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Really? It's a con that you can't get less than 512gb? If less storage was offered they'd just swap to "not enough storage in the base model." I can't take this seriously.

[–] Omegamanthethird 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Maybe. But let's judge based on what was actually written instead of a different theoretical article.

An additional smaller storage model that is cheaper is objectively a good thing. Not having that available means fewer choices for consumers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know what this "different theoretical article" is.

[–] Omegamanthethird 1 points 1 year ago

' If less storage was offered they'd just swap to "not enough storage in the base model." '

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)