this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)
Fight For Privacy
294 readers
1 users here now
Fight For Privacy
A community to post, discuss and fight for our privacy.
Post Title Rule
Tag what the post is:
-
[DISCUSSION]
-
[CH], [etc.], : Article (tag the country, if not country specific use [ARTICLE])
-
[SEARCHING]: Searching for people/activists
-
[GUIDE]: Guide or how to
-
[UPDATE]: Moderator update for community
Post examples
- [EU] - Title of the link/post
- [DISCUSSION] - Privacy ...
- [SEARCHING] - Referendum ...
Language: English
Rules
- Keep the topic on privacy
- Be respectful and tolerant
- When posting link use tools like CleanURL to get rid of trackers
- When posting numbers or statements, you need to link the source
- Promotion of products/brands are forbidden
- Politics not regarding privacy is forbidden, keep it on laws/decisions that concern privacy
- If possible post Invidious links instead of YouTube
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why did I not got wind of that, thank you for bringing it to my attention!
I see the thinking behind it and that a state needs some tools to find and prosecute criminals, and that they did not follow the UK with E2E-Ban is good to hear.
But, that the council made changes AFTER the criticism shows that we need to be more on edge and look even closer on them, and maybe even start to launch more referendums. It could be a good idea to launch an initiative that clearly states and sets surveillance laws that protect the privacy and integrity of Swiss citizens. I'm very worried that as many other countries in the last few years, Switzerland too starts to value surveillance higher than privacy.
Does any one have the legal texts, I can't find it somehow...
Edit:
I can't check if this is the same but what I found:
Source: https://www.vischer.com/en/knowledge/blog/modernisation-of-surveillance-law-at-ordinance-level-part-1-39485/