Why not real green energy which does not produce nuclear waste that has to be stored safely for thousands of years and where most places dont have a place to store it in?

Because that's not a real issue. Not only is it true that we do have a perfectly-good place to store it that we refuse to use for no good reason, we don't actually need to store it at all because we ought to be reprocessing it instead.

Probably because we can't reach energy demands with just renewable energy.

You should look up how the power grid works. Most energy is generated on demand. When the sun isn't out and the wind isn't blowing, you have to rely on stored energy.

I don't know if you've been paying attention to energy storage technology, but it's not very good right now. Until it improves, foregoing additional sources of energy that we can generate on demand is asinine.

To be honest though, you're just a victim of propaganda that exists to funnel as much money to Solar as possible. Be careful. Whenever there is a bunch of money being passed around, there will also be a bunch of misinformation and grifters.

Every place has a place to store it. It's pretty safe and easy to store and does not need to be significantly contained for that long of a period. It's relatively safe. "Real" green energy also produces a lot of waste and dangerous byproducts that "need to be" (read, should but often not) contained. Do you think solar panels grow on trees? No, the resources need to be mines and refined.