Starfield

2850 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
Add [Spoilers] to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post.
Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

&lt;spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Starfield's new PC patch delivers the game we should have had at launch (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“The game we should have had at launch”

It’s just DLSS and quest and bug fixes.

Whoever wrote that shit should be ashamed of themselves.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am 100% convinced that all the news articles being about DLSS missing is controversial, or means the games incomplete, or whatever, are funded by nvidia.

Cause the level of ridiculousness I've seen cause the game didnt support DLSS is absolutely insane. Like, proper mental.

You don't see this kinda shit when a game doesnt have FSR.

Especially when Starfield is being made by what is now a Xbox studio, so they would make sure the game would work on XBox... Which is graphically driven by AMD hardware..that supports FSR and not DLSS. So its not some big ridiculous conspiracy theory that DLSS wasnt in the initial plan.