Asklemmy

43974 readers

649 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

197

Americans of Lemmy, what is your approach to next year's election? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

267 comments fedilink hide all child comments

2020 was... truly unique. It was so hard to stay away from doom scrolling, and I (and many others) were pretty disillusioned by the sad fact that so much of our country legitimately supported the Orange Man. I didn't get a wink of sleep the night of the election because I genuinely considered it to be a make or break decision for America.

My point is that looking back on it, in the end the only real difference I made was at the ballet box. This year I'm going for the Head-in-the-Sand approach. I'm done with the political memes. Done with the Twitter screenshots. It just riles me up and this year I'm gonna do my best to fight that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] brutallyhonestcritic -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, sure. Easy Peasy! Let’s just go ahead and be naive enough to expect Congress to pass A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT THAT TAKES AWAY THEIR PROFIT MOTIVES.

I think, if we just ask super, duper, duper, duper, duper nicely, they’ll stop being corrupt and intentionally sabotage their own profits. /s

I just got finished with my letter to Santa Claus. This is going to be there year he finally listens to me. I just know it!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

RCV can be implemented from the bottom up as well, it doesn't need to be top-down in the form of a constitutional amendment. Where it gets implemented it immediately flips the incentives from candidates working against each other to candidates working with each other. In SF, rival candidates started campaigning together.

Then, we could stop voting against the greater evil and start voting for the kinds of candidates we want without consequence, because candidate viability doesn't matter if your vote transfers to your next favorite when they are disqualified. That's what you seem to want. You could vote Rashida Talib and anyone else and as long as you ranked Biden as a choice above Trump, you wouldn't be in this dilemma.

I think you would be well served by playing the game even if it's a game you don't like. That's the only way to change the rules. Popular vote is the only check the public has against the power of profit motives.

[–] brutallyhonestcritic 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for your mature, nuanced reply. I’m dug in where I am but it’s a start, I guess.