World News

31482 readers

945 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

485

Hospitals have special protection under the rules of war. Why are they in the crosshairs in Gaza? (apnews.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Nobody to c/[email protected]

181 comments fedilink hide all child comments

JERUSALEM (AP) — The head of surgery at Gaza’s largest and most advanced hospital held up his phone Saturday to the hammering of gunfire and artillery shelling. “Listen,” said Dr. Marwan Abu Sada as fighting raged around Shifa Hospital.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What a terrible headline. If APNews thinks it's a war crime, it has a duty to say so. You can't just write a headline like this without drawing the obvious inference.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Does that headline not read war crime to you somehow?

[–] stewsters 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well it's kind of open to interpretation, which may be why they didn't want to directly say that, just imply it.

Article 19 of the Geneva convention:

The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only after due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.

Now are firing qassam rockets "harmful to the enemy"? Probably.

Has due warning been given? Maybe? It's not well defined what that means. Does roof knocking count? Do you need to submit a form to their embassy?

I think the big problem is that the kind of warfare we are seeing here is unlike what they saw when they wrote those laws.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

It is written in the passive. That's intentional; it's a classic approach that writers use to dodge the issue. It's not OK and we shouldn't excuse it.