this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
94 points (99.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43989 readers
1255 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Of course it wouldn't stop colonialization, but it would change the future quite a lot.

  • No English-speaking superpowers/English as lingua franca
  • No Commonwealth
  • No wide-spread anglo common law based legal systems
  • Superpowers/alliances would be totally mixed up up to now.
  • China could have developed totally different due to them not constantly losing against the English.
  • No colonialization of the Welsh, Scots, Irish by the English

I think that should shake up the timeline quite a bit.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you'd just have the exact same thing but with another nationality. France had like half of Africa so they'd definitely be bigger.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

And wouldn't that completely shift worldwide powerbalanes for centuries to come?

For example, would WW2 have happened if France had been a global superpower instead of a pushover?

Would the american revolution have happened with another colonial ruler?

Without that example, would the french revolution have happened?

Without both revolutions, would democracy be a thing by now, or would we still have totalitarian monarchies?

You know the butterfly effect? It's the same except we aren't killing a butterfly but instead one of the superpower nations of that time.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

France was never a pushover. The idea that being invaded by a bigger stronger army was their fault is weird and one I've only heard in the US.

Most countries that are colonies eventually seek independence, including most that France had.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

France wasn't a pushover around WW2. They had enough manpower to fight nazi Germany toe to toe. What they did, however, was underestimate how fast they could advance. France also ignored a warning that the germans were amassing to push through the Ardennes, which allowed the nazis to face little resistance on that front. Apparently, if they took immediate action, they could've mobilized an air raid to completely destroy that nazi battalion, which would royally fuck up the rest of Hitler's plans