Asklemmy

43913 readers

816 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you think there's better ways to fediverse? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally I think that if there was like a central link/front end to access everything and then have each user be able to have a recommended list of instances/hosts to access would be a more user friendly solution and a better solution for search engines. I know the fediverse is about decentralization but having a central front end and decentralized back end seems easier for new users. And then for the back ended hosting aspect each host would be able to manually pick which instances or communities to host and mirror. I'd like to hear your ideas since I have no idea what I'm talking about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the front end could also be hosted by everyone then it's just the link that stays the same then?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You've just kicked the can down the road. What then when the centralized link repo charges for api access, and also drops links it doesn't like?

When you try to go centralized, it's turtles all the way down. Something will have control that breaks the nature of being federated.

Unless there's multiple link aggregators to choose from... but then that's what we already have!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could be open source with a democratic voting system for a front end host in the community then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, but someone ultimately pays for the instance that is centralized. It's that owner that could be susceptible to turning evil at worst, and misguided at best.

democratic voting system

This is not infallible either. If money or power comes into it, you can bet on corruption.