this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
75 points (93.1% liked)

The Agora

1598 readers
13 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We should do our absolute best to not become a siloed instance. I predict we will start seeing certain instances be almost inaccessible which will lead to their users migrating to more open instances. It's already becoming clear to me that certain instances will lose users over time if they continue actively segregating their instance from others.

Individual bad actors on other instances is not a good enough reason to defederate. If a troll is bothing someone they can be blocked/banned on sh.itjust.works. I don't expect instance creators to ban all trolls, it's not possible.

Defederation should be reserved for severe cases when another instance shows no interest in moderating. The two instances defederated right now are justified: one condones the denial historical events and actively censors opposition, and the other was condoning heinous illegal activies regarding underage individuals. These are two clear examples of where defederation makes sense.

Defederation should only be used as a last resort.

My previous post continues this sentiment from a couple days ago here: https://sh.itjust.works/post/281126

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

True. Although, I've seen even the most aggressively defederated instances of mastodon be very active long-term and even grow. (poa.st may be one of the most defederated instances for example, and 1. there's still a lot of instances federated to them and 2. they still have a very active userbase.)

Quick note about this:

the other was condoning heinous illegal activies regarding underage individuals

As far as I know, they don't actually condone anything regarding "individuals" per se. Afaik Burggit's underage content is limited to hentai (japanese-style drawings) specifically. Which is not to say it is not illegal, because in Canada, it is illegal and categorized as child pornography.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

underage content is limited to hentai

In my opinion I don't see that as a limit, hentai can be even more fine tuned to give satisfaction to those who desire it. I don't want to see it on any platform that I take part in even including www.lemmynsfw.com which has made it explicitly clear that they will not accept anything that even resembles such a thing. ANYTHING related to underage content within that context should be forbidden, it benefits no one and is demonstrably harmful.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my opinion I don’t see that as a limit,

Do you mean that you have seen that they do not limit themselves to hentai, and do in fact condone activities beyond that?

www.lemmynsfw.com which has made it explicitly clear that they will not accept anything that even resembles such a thing

True, I read that the general consensus from people in the instance poll is to not allow it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean that I don't see hentai as a limit, nothing about hentai is "limiting". It's still not welcome. I'm glad lemmynsfw made that decision early on to be strict forbidding anything that even slightly resembles that content.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s just as bad as allowing it in any other format, possibly even worse.

I have moderated very active open chatrooms in the past and lemme tell ya, the "real stuff" is way worse. For the sake of your (and everyone else reading this thread's) sanity, I won't go into too much detail about what kids endure. But when it comes to the question of whether a sexualized drawing of a kid is worse than a community-funded video of the abuse of a kid... I'm sure you probably didn't think much about what you said lol.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where did I compare such a thing?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, I said that it is "limited to hentai" in the sense that there is no real-life underage pornography. There's no pics & vids of kids basically. And you said that you think that it's not "limited", because hentai is way worse than other types of such content, which made me think you were talking about hentai being worse than child pornography, to which I replied as I did.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok then why did you say it's not "limited to" then.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is my full comment again for you to read:

In my opinion I don’t see that as a limit, hentai can be even more fine tuned to give satisfaction to those who desire it. I don’t want to see it on any platform that I take part in even including www.lemmynsfw.com which has made it explicitly clear that they will not accept anything that even resembles such a thing. ANYTHING related to underage content within that context should be forbidden, it benefits no one and is demonstrably harmful.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

K, so, I'm not a native English speaker, maybe that's the problem cuz I have no idea where I am misreading.

You say that they are not "limited" to underage hentai (implying that they are doing even worse things than underage hentai), and that's because hentai can be customized to their taste (no idea how this is relevant), that lemmynsfw won't accept underage hentai, and you don't want anything related to underage nsfw-ness.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a native speaker and I interpreted their comment the same way if that counts for anything.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Thx lol, makes me feel a little reassured about my linguistic abilities 🙂

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

To claim something is "demonstrably harmful" you actually have to demonstrate harm, not just cry about people liking fiction you don't.