this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
1244 points (93.2% liked)

Leftism

2135 readers
17 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Solarpunk memes [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

UBI is pretty bad, but only because capitalists would abuse it. Get rid of the capitalists and we'd be fine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Without capitalism, we don't really need UBI because we can just go more socialist.

You don't need "more money" if society guarantees your quality of life with no strings attached.

[–] LemmysMum 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You still need a system of currency as individuals should be allowed to use their skills to barter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never said you didn't. Money is a great way to barter labor for luxury when you exist in a system where you can never starve. Nobody is saying the government should cover Wagyu beef for every meal, or free yachts for people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm fairly confident that corporations would argue that corporations are people, and therefore should get their allotment of UBI at a rate of one full income per stock share, and they'd probably win that argument too, considering the state of our legislature. Then they would argue that actual people getting their share of UBI is harming corporate profits and get UBI cancelled for everyone except the largest corporations. We still have land reaping subsidies not to grow crops from the New Deal, and all that land has made its way into the hands of the wealthy.