this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
803 points (97.9% liked)

Memes

45751 readers
1569 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolrami 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

q1 and q2 can be negative. The force is the same as if they were positive because -1 x -1 = 1

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In this case yes, but if q1 was -20μC, q2 was 30μC, and r was 0.5m, then using -20μC as it is would make F equal to -21.6N which is just 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they are oppositely charged particles, I would expect that there is a force of attraction acting on them, yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not saying that's wrong, just that there's 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges not -21.6N.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But those are the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, if the force is negative it acts in the opposite direction

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, and a force acting in the opposite direction of the distance is an attractive force.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But that if both are negative not one pos one neg like the previous commenter gave in their examples, so the true formula has an absolute value in the numerator: |q1Xq2|

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No, but there should be a minus in the Coulomb formula