this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
264 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
2758 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
264
Jeff Bezos urged Amazon to flood search results with junk ads, FTC alleges (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Jeff Bezos urged Amazon to flood search results with junk ads, FTC alleges::Amazon's ads strategy helped pump its profits while steering shoppers to higher-priced goods, the agency alleges.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fuzzypyro 43 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What is it with these “allegations”? This is the kind of stuff they would brag about on investor calls.

[–] flawedFraction 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In legal proceedings, statements like this are allegations. They are not considered to be true or factual until proven in court. You'll see the word allegedly used even if it seems very obvious that someone did something because that is the correct way to report it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah it’s legalize gymnastics. Only when convicted can you pin their crime.

Beforehand, they are the alleged killer. Even if they were found at the scene with a gun in their hand, till the jury renders the verdict, they are only alleged to be the killer.

[–] Fades 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You say it like it’s a bad thing, personally I prefer the innocent until proven guilty approach

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think it’s more a case by case. In this case, there was sooooo much clear evidence. Like indisputable.

But generally, no I fully agree. Imagine some random lunatic says you raped his daughter. Even in our current climate you’d be kinda fucked but if news was allowed to report like you just plain did it, trial or evidence be damned… awww jeeezzz.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 1 points 1 year ago

I could just see something like the defendent somehow getting a guards gun and shooting a jury member.

The next day they are in court, 1 dead juror missing, and telling the jurors he allegedly shot at them.

I know that wouldn't happen, but would be funny (ignoring the whole murder part)

load more comments (3 replies)