this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
45 points (97.9% liked)
Europeans
127 readers
12 users here now
Actual Europe. Open debate about european and international matters.
Europe news and opinion from European countries. Scope is limited to geographical Europe including all EU countries but no further.
Rules:
- Articles in English only
- Titles should represent the article and not be overly sensational (you can edit the article title to remove clickbait but NOT to add it)
- No more than 2 stories about the same event . Older stories may be deleted
- No pictures or postcards.
- More Coming soon
Act honorably. Here is some good guidelines
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
that's racist
... y'know, you're right.
I've been struggling with this one for the past year, because I'll be honest here, during an actual live war, racism is useful. It's easier to kill an enemy than it is to kill a person, that's why we try to dehumanize them in the first place. So our soldiers can fucking shoot them without it weighing their spirits down. They're not "fighting people", they're executing animals, or mowing the lawn, or whatever.
But... it comes with a cost. Because the war ends someday, and that old tool that made it easier to fight that war, also happens to make more wars in the future more likely, by hindering future cooperation and understanding. We know why we don't like Russians, but the racist attitudes get handed down. Our children won't know why, just that Russians are evil.
To paraphrase Stephen Kotkin, winning the war is one thing. But we need to remember to win the peace too, or more wars will be too likely, far too soon.
funny*