this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
516 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39141 readers
2925 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you just using ChatGPT, or another LLM, to string words and concepts together?

Kinda sounds like you are, at least for significant sections of your responses.

Some parts are just confusing as to why even include them, unless you actually have no idea what they mean, or why they're not contextually relevant, for example:

GSM? Nope, not a factor..

PCIE - why specify v4?

But, whatever, I'm not a Raytheon engineer. Doesn't matter if you convice me (you haven't, but doesn't matter).

Edit: also, FWIW, Those constraints aren't artificial. They're each specific to what you're suggesting.

Old American tech, retrofitted and repurposed with brand new tech, and then integrated with, and fired from, old Soviet tech.

There is a reason that NATO was only able to integrate fire control to the HARM for the SU's, and not all of its cockpit control features and capabilities. Which is why they have to preprogrammed for each sortie...

[–] Aceticon -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes sense that somebody who thinks radar "radiation" is different from radiowaves can't follow point-by-point electronics engineering explanations and design engineering considerations so thinks they must be the product of ChatGPT.

Should've dropped this conversation after the comment where you explained radar "radiation" as special.

Thanks for the lesson.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not special, just a lot more power being fed through it vs other battlefield RF.

I followed, but it was just dumb. Way too many words to explain, or justify, a functionally unsound idea: converting HARM into a new missle, with a different purpose (Counter-EW vs SEAD).

But okay, you're cleary an ubermensch, go to Raytheon, or start a new company. I'm sure you'll get boatloads of investors.