this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
123 points (96.9% liked)

PC Gaming

8299 readers
1098 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hal_5700X 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Singapore keeps throwing money at it, Ubisoft takes it in and let's Ubi Singapore work on that dumpster fire.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You have a source for that? I've only seen Ubi is on the hook for the money used if the game doesn't ship

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Nope. The only known "fact" is that Ubisoft was given a grant by Singapore which obligated them to release it at some point. Can't imagine why Ubisoft would keep that thing in development for so long instead of just releasing anything if it wasn't for external money that they don't have to care about.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

why?, valve keep the game in development for longer, and in the end if worth, why can't ubisoft do the same?