Asklemmy

43745 readers

2041 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why are (mobile) browsers so big? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by illectrility to c/[email protected]

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why are so many mobile browsers at least 100, if not 200 megabytes in size? Even Firefox Focus which is supposed to be small and, you know, focussed is 85MB big.

The smallest browser I could find was the /e/ Foundation's built-in browser for /e/OS. It's 12MB.

It's kind of between Firefox and Focus in terms of features so why are all other browsers so big? Is there a small version of Firefox for Android?

Edit: I just looked up the /e/ Browser repo on their GitLab and the browser appears to be bigger than the 12MB displayed in App Info. It's about 70MB, so pretty comparable to the other browsers. I was so confused by the size difference but that's cleared up now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] illectrility 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

165??? That's insane, you may be better off with KeePassDX. It combines password managing and TOTP

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, I had my own authenticator (Aegis) until MS decided you can only use theirs

[–] illectrility 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait what? They force you to use their authenticator? How, when, what?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It started nagging I need to switch to Microsoft's authenticator but it was skippable for a while until it wasn't 🤷‍♂️. They apparently use their own method that other authenticators can't imitate.