this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
97 points (99.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8651 readers
895 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MotoAsh 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's literally true of ALL action against the company, though... The devs don't have power to magically pay themselves more when the company sees a windfall. The execs do.

Saying, "this will hurt the devs" when attacking the company is worse than useless rhetoric that's simply wrong. It is NOT TRUE because it is not a unique attribute of this situation... They get fucked 24/7. Saying they'll get fucked more is basic fear mongering tripe.

[โ€“] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

This isn't attacking the company though. It's attacking a single game and the company/publisher will just roll on through.