this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
405 points (90.3% liked)

World News

38976 readers
3362 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mondoweiss.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jadalovelace 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i think the implication is not that the reporter's family was targeted, but that israel is not taking civilian casualties serious.

The embarassing part here is Blinken telling a news agency to tone down their coverage, even though the families of employees are being murdered.

yes, Blinken made his comment before the family died. That shouldn't really change how fucked up this is.

[–] Otkaz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article very clearly accused Israel of targeting his family.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but there's a difference between an article saying something, and something being true. This isn't exactly an unbiased source.

[–] Otkaz 0 points 1 year ago

Yes of course and I'm posting on that article to question the claims it's making. OP stated that the implication was not that the family was targeted but if you read the article it very clearly is. I want to know if there are any supporting facts because it seems unlikely to me.

[–] greenmarty -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think most of the folks posting here read it as fact that Israel specifically targeted this guy family to scare others for reporting against Israel. It's like "see!?, I told'ya !"

[–] Otkaz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you even open the article? Just read the first paragraph.

Today, Al-Jazeera Bureau Chief Wael El-Dahdouh was reporting live in Gaza when an Israeli airstrike killed his wife and two children. Now, other journalists also fear their families could be targeted solely for them doing their job.

[–] greenmarty -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Have you even read my post?
It's not about whether guy's family died at all but wether his family was specifically targeted and wither the motive was to scare jurnalists.

[–] Otkaz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You said "most people here read it as fact that Israel tarteted his family" I'm saying well yeah the article stated it as fact that they targeted his family I just want to know if that is likely or not because to me it seems far fetched.

[–] greenmarty 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. It makes less sense they specifically targeted random journalist family than the version that his family was killed by being at the place that was shelled. It sad nevertheless, though.