Science Fiction

898 readers

1 users here now

This magazine is aimed at fans and creators of sci-fi and related media of all kinds. It includes all content related to the sci-fi genre and only content related to the sci-fi genre. The goal is to build a community for everyone who enjoys science fiction and related topics. This includes the obvious books, movies, and TV shows, but also original writing, the discussion of writing SF, futuristic art and designs, and the science and technologies that inspire the sci-fi genre. **Team Top 20**

founded 2 years ago

168

What's your Sci-Fi unpopular opinion? (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

362 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's a slightly click-baity title, but as we're still generating more content for our magazines, this one included, why not?

My Sci-fi unpopular opinion is that 2001: A Space Odyssey is nothing but pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. I've tried watching it multiple times and each time I have absolutely no patience for the pointless little scenes which contain little to no depth or meaningful plot, all coalescing towards that 15 minute "journey" through space and series of hallucinations or whatever that are supposed to be deep, shake you to your foundations, and make you re-think the whole human condition.

But it doesn't. Because it's just pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. Planet of the Apes was released in the same year and is, on every level, a better Sci-fi movie. It offers mystery, a consistent and engaging plot, relatable characters you actually care about, and asks a lot more questions about the world and our place in it.

It insists upon itself, Lois.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GlitchyDigiBun 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Starship Troopers is a good movie. The book is legendary, and after having consumed both pieces of media, I can safely assert that both were far-forward thinking for their time, both in terms of the tropes they helped enshrine into SF (dropship landings on planets, orbital bombardment, using exosuits to combat or enhance gravity, and so many more), but also in the realm of political commentary. The movie alone, to say nothing of the book, is a masterfully crafted parody of a fascist earth. The subtle inferrences into the unneccessary costs of a war that only serves to keep taxpayer costs down being carried out believably by a cartoonishly militaristic world government definitely gave me pause when I reflected on the histories of modern democracies.

[–] theDOSgod 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, just watched it again last week. So entertaining and just a fun movie to watch. Then when you watch it again you can dissect the political backgrounds and all the depth they put in the movie. Yes the book is great also, I think they should be considered separate stories though.

[–] GlitchyDigiBun 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see the entire movie as a satirically propogandized version of the book, all down to exactly what they chose -not- to put in from the books, such as Rico's father's plotline. Focusing on "the hero of Klendathu" turns a straightforward critique on the military industrial complex into a brash critique on exactly the kind of toxic patriotism that leads to warmongering, and how the soldiers on the ground are the victims to that end. Certainly different stories, but I argue they both fit neatly into the lore when taken on face value. [Would you like to know more?]

[–] theDOSgod 1 points 1 year ago

I think this depends on what age you are when you watch it. My son watched it recently (17) and his take away was WAY different. Much more action movie. It took another viewing to really get into the why and background information of the movie.

It's been a long time since I read the book (really long). With the new video game that just came out for it hopefully it'll get more people reading it (but probably not, they'll just watch the movie lol) but the game looks fun