this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
1239 points (95.5% liked)

Memes

45871 readers
1240 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's okay you don't know how to use Google. I'll keep it simple, just for you.

Furry no fuck dog. Furry like watch Lion King pretend be lion. Lion not have office job. Lion looks fun to be. On weekend furry put on lion costume talk to other furry. Good self expression. Is fun. You should try.

[–] archonet -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yyyyyyeeeeaaahhhhhh no that doesn't hold water. See, fetishizing animals is wrong, and I don't know if you know this, but they also do that. A lot.

And I don't know if you know this, but being the guy defending loli and shota still makes you a pedophile, just the same as being the guy defending fetishizing animals makes you a dogfucker.

It's okay, I still forgive your stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know if you're aware of this, but there's a difference between fiction and reality. In fiction, animals can do things that they can't do in real life, like talk, and give consent. Furries, like most people with an IQ above 5, are aware of this distinction.

Like I said earlier, furries are extremely quick to attack and kick out anyone who even thinks about fucking an animal in real life. This is something I feel the need to repeat, since when I said it the first time, you suddenly forgot how to read.

Relatedly, if you keep plugging your ears and singing when somebody makes a point you don't like, you're going to run out of people to argue with.

[–] archonet 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh no, please continue defending the fetishization of animals like it doesn't make you look like an animal fucker, it amuses me greatly. :D

See the reality is that jerking it to animals fucking is still jerking it to animals fucking, regardless of whatever fiction you like to tell yourself. See I really don't care about that last part, the reality is yer still jerking off to animals. Which, again, not all that different from the pedophile who jerks it to loli and justifies it with "akshually she's a 12000 year old goddess in the form of a 9 year old". They're still a pedophile. If you like your fiction you tell yourself to sleep at night, why, good for you champ! Your reality distortion field only covers you, though. Doesn't mean I have to indulge it. c:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Let me ask you a question, completely off hand, no tricks up my sleeve, just to get a baseline understanding of where you're coming from so we can have a civil conversation like the adults we are.

Suppose someone thought Mickey Mouse was hot. Would that make them a dogfucker?

[–] archonet -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Abstracting it also doesn't change the reality, super chief. Animals are animals and humans are humans, there is no "gotcha" you have to change this fact -- not cartoon characters nor catgirls -- if you were attracted to humans, you'd jerk off to regular porn featuring humans like the rest of us. But nice try anyways.

And as an aside, I'm guessing you were a big fan of Disney growing up. It's my personal theory the reason dogfuckers exist is because of shitty parents who park their kids in front of a TV set and let the colorful talking animals raise their children for them in their formative years, which then translates into warped sexual preferences around puberty. That sound about right, champ? You first beat off to a cartoon character? I'm reckoning so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wrong on both counts, but as long as we're making baseless assumptions about each other, I'm betting you also think it's immoral to be thirsty for anime boobs/tentacles, even if the characters are visibly of age (not my cup of tea but I digress) and/or that sex between two men is unnatural. Am I right? Probably not, but it sure sounds good.

[–] archonet -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Actually I'm gay, but I can't blame you for being wrong -- you've demonstrated a marked habit for it. And now you're not even trying to refute what I say. That's okay, I accept your concession. Better luck next time, dogfucker!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't think "thinking catgirls are cute equals actually literally fucking dogs" dignified a response.

[–] archonet -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fine, I still accept your concession. :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When someone's that deep in a false equivalence, they're not worth arguing with. You won't change your mind no matter what I say, so I've decided to stop wasting my time feeding the trolls. I hope someday you poke your nose out your front door and realize that what people do and don't like doesn't decide whether they're Bad People(tm), but for now, good day.

[–] archonet -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're still here?

And oh, by the way, I think I can in fact determine that people who fetishize animals or children (either or) are not good people -- that's the nice thing, glaring deficits in a person's morality that big are kind of hard to miss. :D

Byebye now! ^^