this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
561 points (97.6% liked)

Memes

46303 readers
2168 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tubbadu 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Meta the company started saying they were going to build a twitter replacement on the fediverse and some instances made a pact to block them to protect their users from Metas invasive privacy violations.

[–] tubbadu 16 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which is ironic given that the Fediverse's structure is pretty much wide open.

[–] grue 9 points 2 years ago

I see it as the Paradox of Tolerance (with proprietary walled-garden makers standing in for the nazis): in order to have a free and open Fediverse, we must not tolerate those who would close it up.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Meta (parent of Facebook, instagram…etc) want to have their content to become federated and part of Lemmy and Mastodon.

Meta has been asking Mastodon and Lemmy server admins to have a “off the record” discussion panel. They told meta to fuck off.

Here’s a post about the email meta has been sending to admins and his response.

https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/82022/Kev-Quirk-one-of-the-admins-of-Fosstodon-a-Mastodon

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

one admin told them that. some of them have actually met with Meta after signing an NDA earlier this week.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That is true. Albeit attending a meeting doesn't necessarily mean you're gonna be selling your soul to Meta. Hopefully, those that do decide to attend stand up for the communities that are being built in the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I would personally be inclined to take the meeting to better know how to counter their efforts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Tbh, I'd really be interested into hearing what is said in that meeting...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They made the admins sign nda's so its unlikely we will hear anything about it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

unfortunate... something ought to be leaked sometime... I mean their messing with internet culture. I hope something slips through

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

I mean, if i was an admin i would rationalize that its in your interest to listen to the enemy if they might reveal their evil plan. Even if you have to sign a contract that you can publicly talk about it. (Can always confine to a distant acquittance that is prone to start rumours)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Fuck that NDA leak the meeting

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

@riktor @webghost0101 @tubbadu Its better if they don't lol because then even Mastodon will have trust issues because zuck can't stop sniffing people's data.

[–] grue 4 points 2 years ago