Australia

3649 readers

85 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Why is the indigenous voice to Parliament so controversial? (self.australia)

submitted 2 years ago by Narc082 to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I thought a group dedicated to ensuring the matters affecting any group of peoples are represented in Parliament would be a good thing. And if this is not "good enough", how will it have a worse outcome than voting no.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In my mind there are two main branches of reasoning: One comes from either racism or a feeling of aggrievement ("why do they get something I dont" kind of thing). The second stems from a misunderstanding of systemic issues, a sort of demographic blindness like "this is a policy that only affects X and that's racist" kind of thing. Arguably the aggrievement fits in here too. This obviously ignores the fact that demographic differences do exist.

Of course there's also the "progressive no" argument that people like Lidia Thorpe argue for, but imo the other two are more common.

[–] Narc082 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yours is the most just understandable explanation so far. But I don't know if I understand this 'progressive no' argument.

I believe we, the Australian people, owe the indigenous peoples a greater weight on those opinion. This is their land after all.

[–] Knoll0114 0 points 2 years ago

Not everyone would agree with you on that belief though, hence some of the disagreement.