this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
-2 points (47.8% liked)

Conservative

391 readers
95 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
-2
NY Bill Would Require Background Checks to Buy 3D Printers, Attempts to Target Ghost Guns (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PizzaMan 0 points 1 year ago

Taking a subset of a political opponent’s argument and showing how it’s harmful is a core conservative rhetorical strategy

I am well aware. I deal with it all the time.

Because none of your arguments are effective.

If you have suggestions I'm all ears. Until then this is only a complaint with no solution.

I'm also not really here to convince conservatives.

In any case, my three links about gun statistics support your argument.

The last two do, but I don't see how your first link comes to a pro-gun control conclusion.