this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
168 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16948 readers
671 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between emulation and what Analogue does. Analogue's products actually implement the hardware of their respective consoles in FPGAs. (Also, what Kecessa said)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it was probably project64 I was using. I get th FPGA is fantastic and allows for, basically reprogrammable hardware (think re-flashing all your firmware at the rate of a few KHz) but isn't this a solution seeking a problem? I never had any real issues emulating N64, and it didn't cost anything.

I'm not really seeing where the benefit of this product is. I hope the sell the crap out of it because it sounds cool, but I would never invest in the idea.

Hope I'm wrong for their sake. If I can't remember the name of an emulator I used 13 years ago, hopefully that means I'm wrong about this too.

I wonder what they're selling it for. FPGAs are about 150-300 off the shelf. Looks like the pocket is selling at 500-800 by scalpers, and I can see the demand for that. Maybe if the 3d plays all PS1, N64 and PS2 games, all in Super sharp 4k?

Regardless, this will be interesting to watch for further developments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are for retro collection junkies. Most people who buy analogue products are only planning on using physical carts to play. This will likely not have openFPGA so don't expect it to run anything but N64 games, it will probably get a custom firmware eventually that allows rom play but that functionality will not be out of the box.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rom play would be good. That would make sense, but I think it would definitely be a mistake to not fully leverage the FPGA and make it do other things. If you have the ability to change your processor into a different processor on the fly, and don't, you should be using custom chip design instead of FPGA. In the long haul, that should be cheaper.

No, if they're using FPGA, and advertising it, the consumer should expect this box to be a chameleon. Anything else would be a disappointment, just looking at their earlier work.

Still, it'll be interesting to see what they do with it but I already know I can't afford it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get where you are coming from but once again this is a niche product for one use only. Just because they use an FPGA doesn't mean it should be capable of running other cores. If a consumer is looking for that type of use then they should be investing in a Mister. Analogue builds retro consoles with cartridge use in mind, they use FPGA because it gives the most accurate experience. It's a boutique product, so yes it's expensive and doesn't make sense to someone who just wants an all in one device like a mister.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting. My understanding of field programmable gate arrays is that they were field programmable and therefore programmable in the field. Perhaps I'm mistaken. I'm just thinking that it would be foolish for them not to leverage this for higher profit. Their handheld has a MIDI sequencer.... Something tells me that maybe they were leveraging it there too.

I recognize this sounds sarcastic but I don't mean it to be. I've just never done any in-depth study into FPGAs, just a little bit of an intro to them when I was back in college an Eon ago. 😂