this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
306 points (95.5% liked)

Games

16948 readers
274 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bouh -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On pc, it is. But you gotta choose where to put your faith, and Bethesda had blind faith from its players for ages.

[–] sturmblast 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not in my experience it isn't I have like 50 hours in starfield and I've had very little bugs at all

[–] bouh -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is exactly what anecdotal evidence is. And that is precisely why it's not relyable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are giving anecdotal evidence.

What isnt anecdotal evidence is that 2077 was so buggy it was preventing people from playing the game, and the game breaking bugs were well documented.

While starfield has no consistent and unavoidable game breaking issues. As shown by zero documentation of stable game breaking bugs.

Theyre not the same.

[–] sturmblast 1 points 1 year ago

couldn't have said it better myself