this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
19 points (82.8% liked)

NZ Politics

561 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's look on the bright side. The people voted this way (quite significantly) so they must be seeing something positive there. I already know all the downsides so let's discuss the upsides.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Homie, watching you get shut down by actual evidence has been brilliant to watch.

Fact is, violent crime is up under Labour, whatever the underlying cause may be, and the current approach isn't working.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Homie, watching you get shut down by actual evidence has been brilliant to watch.

If I am presented with compelling evidence, I will change my view. So far, nothing he has supplied has in any meaningful way supported the assertion that longer prison sentences lowers crime rates.

Fact is, violent crime is up under Labour, whatever the underlying cause may be, and the current approach isn't working.

You are absolutely right, violent crime has risen recently. But instead of just blaming the incumbent, perhaps we should be lookings the broader picture as to why this has happened? Do we know a 'tough on crime' policy would not have seen the same rise in crime? No, we do not. However, many of the things Labour has been implementing have proven effects in lowering crime and recidivism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no amount of evidence that you will not dismiss offhand as "inconclusive", while using equally vague evidence to support your own argument.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

That simply isn't true, but you can think whatever you want. Just because I don't agree with your conclusions does not mean I am dogmatic about it.

I remain unconvinced. Many experts remain unconvinced. The justice department remains unconvinced. Many other governments remain unconvinced. That is enough for me.