this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Emacs

322 readers
1 users here now

A community for the timeless and infinitely powerful editor. Want to see what Emacs is capable of?!

Get Emacs

Rules

  1. Posts should be emacs related
  2. Be kind please
  3. Yes, we already know: Google results for "emacs" and "vi" link to each other. We good.

Emacs Resources

Emacs Tutorials

Useful Emacs configuration files and distributions

Quick pain-saver tip

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
2
Future of remote development (alien.top)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm interested to know what the future of remove development with emacs might look like. I'm a long time emacs user, and use rust, lsp-mode, magit and projectile heavily. The remote experience with tramp just isn't very good. I've had to work around several bugs that lead to hangs, and even though I'm only ~20millis away from my remote machine performance is pretty bad. I believe I've already done everything I can to make it fast (ssh control master, etc.), and I'm still not happy. On the other hand, VSCode (which I'm not familiar with) or IntelliJ make remote development a breeze. I really like how they hide latency, and handle reconnects well. I've also tried terminal emacs on the remote machine, but I just can't deal with the input lag.

It's remarkable how emacs has been able to adapt over the years, and so I'm interested to hear about some ideas to keep emacs relevant for this usecase.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When possible, I think it's much better to edit the code locally and synchronize it periodically with the remote. This doesn't need to be clunky, and is an extension of the fact that you need to periodically synchronize buffer contents with their file a.k.a. save them.