this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
183 points (95.1% liked)

World News

39145 readers
3698 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would it work for a larger country to fly in refugees, since hopefully they'd be much more resistant to civil wars? It'd be hard to sell your citizens on spending that much on non-citizens though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd basically be flying a while other small country into your country. I doubt any state wants that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't all need to go one place, but I agree it's unlikely to happen.

This is potentially larger than the rwandan genocide if you count all 2M inhabitants. We can't just let all these people die.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right? We could split them up more, basically make the entire population a refugee diaspora split among various Arab countries, but then that means the Jewish people just did to another people what they claim was bad for them. Plus, isn't forcing migration is basically genocide? We can't condemn Stalin for doing the same thing a country we support is doing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that'd be pretty terrible. But letting them be killed would be a lot worse. If there aren't enough supplies able to get in, and countries don't want to force Israel, it might be the lesser of two evils.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That is a better solution for those who want to flee or have the means or freedom to flee, or are ok with abandoning their communities and historical ties. However this would only help those refugees. For those who remain the situation will remain untenable until militants stop rising to power within Palestinian territories, and Israel negotiates a two state solution that involves giving up some land.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have a feeling we'll have more refugees than capacity to help them. But I agree.