this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
165 points (90.6% liked)

World News

32348 readers
50 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Stop ignoring history Jews were living on that territory for thousands of years, unlike Europeans un America. You are conveniently ignoring facts which would immediately render your analogy completely bogus.

[–] Lurk99777 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And the native Americans weren't? You're the one ignoring history or intentionally misunderstanding the analogy.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Case A: population X came to a new land and killed almost all of population Y which lived there before.

Case B: population X came back to their homeland, got attacked by population Y, won the war, didn't not kill population Y, regularly tried to establish truce with population Y which continues to refuse the population X's right to exist.

[–] Lurk99777 1 points 1 year ago

Their homeland? It wasn't their homeland for hundreds of years. The Zionist movement displaced people already living there who had nothing to do with a conflict that occurred hundreds of years prior. They didn't kill the Palestinians outright but they sure as hell did a good job of systematically stripping them of their rights to exist.

Their stated goal from the beginning was to invade and establish a religious state where people were already living similar to what Europeans did when they colonized the Americas.