United Kingdom

4094 readers

185 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

160

Living in privately rented homes linked to faster biological ageing, study finds (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Living in a privately rented home is linked to more rapid biological ageing, according to researchers who tested DNA and found the tenure is associated with twice the ageing effect of obesity and half that of smoking.

The peer-reviewed study of 1,420 UK householders found housing circumstances can “get under the skin” with significant consequences for health, said academics at the University of Essex and the University of Adelaide . Their findings were published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Living in a place where renting is not the norm, what's this about 18 year olds coming to your home every 6 months?

[–] batmangrundies 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Real estate's do regular inspections, every six months (it used to be 3) These are usually handled by the most junior agents.

If you're not home they can let themselves in.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That definitely sounds dodgy! Unless it's an emergency, landlords have to give you notice that they're coming round and you can tell them no if it's not convenient.

It’s likely that you have a key to the property, but don’t make the mistake of letting yourself in, even if you are certain the property is empty. This is strictly against the law unless it is legitimately an emergency.

https://www.landlordvision.co.uk/blog/when-landlord-legally-enter-property/

[–] batmangrundies 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am Australian.

I'm glad to see the responses haha. I wish more Aussies could see how shocking it is, how far we've let tenants rights fall.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Fair, I should have deduced that from the general language in your initial post! This is the UK sub though so you can't blame me for assuming!

[–] brianorca 1 points 1 year ago

Most states in the US have similar laws. Typically requires 24 hour notice, can be delayed by the tenant's request, and must be during business hours. (With exceptions for emergencies such as a fire or water leak.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yikes, even if agreed upon having to let someone in for inspections every 6 months sounds tiring.

[–] DrCake 4 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure they can only let themselves in if you say they can at the start of the tenancy. When we rented we said no and they could not come in for inspections unless we let them in