this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
287 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

60086 readers
5148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As someone who has an uncanny ability to recognize voices, I'm skeptical about how good these really are. Of course, most people don't share that ability.

Meanwhile, I could probably be fooled by a picture.

[–] PilferJynx 16 points 1 year ago

Hmm, I understand your sentiment, but how would you know. Of course you'd pick out the bad dupes but this technology is getting really good that I fear it would go unnoticed, especially if they keep the detectable ones to reinforce bias

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always thought being able to recognize voices is a common skill? Is it not?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Very much not, in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, does a familiar voice mean a famous person or personal friend?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

For me, it could be either. Some of us recognize people by their voices more than by their faces.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t have examples but having listened to some samples of various Ai generated clones (the one paper had samples of I believe 10s, 30s, 1min, 5 min) and all of them progressively sounded better. The 10 second one basically sounded like a voice call whose bit rate dropped out mid word. And the voice so long as you used words that were similar in phoenix sounded pretty close. Although this is just my experience, but to you it might sound pretty bad while to me it sounded pretty reasonable if under bad audio conditions.

https://github.com/CorentinJ/Real-Time-Voice-Cloning

This is the main one I’ve seen examples of. You’ll have to find the samples yourself, I believe it was in the actual paper?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That code was state of the art (for free software) when the author first published it with his master's thesis four years ago, but it hasn't improved a lot since then and I wouldn't recommend it today. See the Heads Up section of the readme. Coqui (a free software Mozilla spinoff) is better but also is sadly still nowhere near as convincing as the proprietary stuff.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wait it’s been 4 years? Time really goes by. Yeah with most Ai things I assumed those with more time and resources would create better models. OS Ai is at a great disadvantage when it comes to data set size and compute power.