this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
24 points (92.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43989 readers
1567 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The only thing I secure is that for a given
Action
by a givenActor
it can be validated that those were signed with a given key.Everyone can interact with that data, but since those are signed with a specific key the sign would become invalidated.
Since the key and signature are just additional attributes of the
Actor
object they'll be the same user federation-wise. An instance admin needs to manually validate why theActor
uses a different key now. If theActor
is used to perform malicious things it can be verified that those things are done with a different key. What's done with this information is up to the instance admins.Exactly. Key signing does not prevent social engineering.