this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

ChatGPT

1527 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss about ChatGPT and AI. Not affiliated with OpenAI.

Rules:

  1. NSFW must be marked as such

  2. No porn

  3. Don't be toxic

  4. jailbreaks are allowed for now at least

  5. No trashposts.

  6. Keep the memes to a minimum

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ndr 1 points 2 years ago

This is a good problem. I do not think it should be used as a reference in scientific papers (at least the way it works now), but there should still be a way to at least let people know where you got that information from.

This is more useful with things like Bing Chat that uses external sources to craft the answers, so you have “real” citations. But yeah, ChatGPT is currently impossible to verify.

I wonder if a seed could be implemented in the future to re-generate the same answers.