this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
8 points (83.3% liked)

Sysadmin

5613 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi all, I want to setup a fileserver as a KVM which will access a 2TB disk partition to store its data. In order to do this I saw 5 options:

  1. Attach the whole disk to the VM and access the partition as you do in the host machine. -> contraindicated by the RHEL documentation for security reasons.

  2. Attach only the partition to the VM. Inside the VM, the partition appears as a drive which needs a new partition table. This seems good to me (for reasons I'll explain later), but I don't know how the partition-table-inside-a-partition thing works and what implications it comes with.

  3. Create a sparse max-2TB qcow2 image, store it in the physical partition and attach it to the VM. -> rejected by me because the partition inside the qcow2 image needs constant resizing as your storage needs grow.

  4. Create a fully initialized 2TB qcow2 image. -> current way of doing it, no resizes, no security concerns (I guess). The only drawback I perceive is the time required to initialize a 2TB image (~2.5hours in an HDD).

  5. Use the physical partition as NFS. I haven't really investigated this solution -nor am I experienced with NFS- but to me it seems like it will require some configuration in the host too, which is something I want to avoid because I don't want to redeploy the host in case shit hits the fan.

So, why 2 seems good to me? Neither resizes as in 3 nor long setup times (image initializing) as in 4.

Is there any other solution that I have missed? If not, out of these, which should I choose?

Sorry for the long, I tried to be as detailed as possible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SheeEttin 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not aware of any on-prem solution that will automatically resize if it needs more space. You could set it up to expand if it hits some low disk space threshold. But if your use case is users randomly sending giant files, consider cloud storage.

Actually, you might be able to do some kind of object storage on-prem, Ceph or something. Personally I would get some enterprise storage, like a full SAN.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You could set it up to expand if it hits some low disk space threshold

That's a good idea, I can be proactive about some things, e.g. it won't get suddenly more than 30GB of data, so I could maybe resize it once the free space is ~50GB. I'll look into it, thanks!