this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
-1 points (47.6% liked)
conservative
1019 readers
11 users here now
A community to discuss conservative politics and views.
Rules:
-
No racism or bigotry.
-
Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.
-
No spam posting.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
-
No trolling.
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You know, I didn't think it a conspracy before I read the article, but thats some good evidence. Like of course 15 minute cities are going to be used as an excuse to curb travel freedoms, it all makes with what ap news outlined. Just incentivize people with 15 minute cities, fine the non-compliers like in Oxford, make travel as inconvient and confusing as possible.
I wonder if /fuckcars is grassroots or astroturf now.
Edit: well this popped up on my feed. Methinks theres something to this. https://aussie.zone/post/2732918
Cities with good city planning are no more at risk than cities with shitty city planning of travel freedoms being taken. So we may as well have good city planning that gives people as many options (freedom) as possible to choose their method of travel. Right now we don't have that freedom, everyone is de-facto forced to own a car.
This is objectively a conspiracy theory with no supporting evidence.
Except that's not how that fine system works:
And that fine system is a completely different thing from a 15 minute city:
Having easily available services is a good thing. Not just for the planet but for our health as well.
It's in the direct dis-interest of oil groups to allow people to exist without cars, so the opposition is astroturfed, and /r/fuckcars grassroots.